Assess the EA organization. Identify capability gaps. Build an improvement roadmap.
Choose a rapid executive assessment or a comprehensive diagnostic. The site calculates weighted scores, compares results with prior assessments stored in the browser, and generates maturity-based improvement actions.
50 Questions
Designed for CIOs, CTOs, business leaders, transformation leaders, portfolio leadership, delivery leaders, and senior architects. Produces an overall EA score and separate Skills Index.
134 Criteria
Assesses 19 EA organizational capabilities using evidence-based criteria, weighted maturity scoring, architecture-domain execution, governance, tooling, value, and improvement.
Print & Benchmark
Print or save a results report, retain structured records in the browser, and export/import JSON or CSV data for longitudinal and cross-user comparison.
Results & Benchmarking
Stored records can be compared with future assessments and exported for consolidation.
Suggested Improvement Plans
Assessment results automatically select the appropriate actions for the current maturity level.
Assessment Method
The model evaluates whether EA is institutionalized, used in enterprise decisions, measured, and producing outcomes—not merely whether architecture artifacts exist.
Executive Scale
0 Absent · 1 Initial · 2 Emerging · 3 Defined · 4 Managed · 5 Optimized. Not Observed is excluded.
Comprehensive Scale
0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10. Documented intent alone normally should not exceed 4; routine enterprise use supports 6; sustained measures and outcomes support 8; continuous optimization supports 10.
Prioritization
Focus first on low-scoring, high-weight areas and material perception gaps. A practical roadmap should normally limit simultaneous major EA improvements to five to seven priorities.